Finch v. Grand Grove of United Ancient Order of Druids
Supreme Court of Minnesota
From a judgment of tlie district court for Ramsey county in favor of defendant, entered pursuant to findings of Otis, J., plaintiff appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtStart, C. J.
The defendant, during the times herein stated, was and is a corporation, having jurisdiction and control of many subordinate unincorporated voluntary associations, designated as “groves,” of which the North Star G-rove No. 4 of Minnesota, United Ancient Order of Druids, is one. On and prior to September 1, 1890, Eugene Finch, then the husband of the plaintiff, was a member of grove No. 4, which was his subordinate grove, and of the defendant corporation, in good standing, and so continued to be until his death ,on October 8, 1890. On July 10, 1890, the defendant organized, and ever since…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Richmond v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
- Mills v. RebstockSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1882
- Hall v. MerrillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
- Bacon v. Brotherhood of Railroad BrakemenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
3Cited by6 opinions
- Gristy v. HudgensArizona Supreme Court · 1922
- Hendrickson v. Grand Lodge A. O. U. W.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
- Day v. ClarkArizona Supreme Court · 1930
- Estes v. Local Union, No. 43, United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of AmericaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
- Fitzgibbons v. BowenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.