Legal Opinion

Sammut v. Pilitz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 6, 2012Published

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover damages based on deceptive trade practices in violation of General Business Law § 349, the defendants appeal (1) from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Adams, J.), entered September 16, 2010, and (2), as limited by their brief, from so much of an amended order of the same court entered May 26, 2011, as granted that branch of the plaintiffs’ motion which was for class certification pursuant to CPLR article 9.

Ordered that the appeal from the order entered September 16, 2010, is dismissed, as that order was superseded by so much of the amended order entered…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Osarczuk v. Associated Universities, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. Smilewicz v. Sears Roebuck & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API