People v. Pinder
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rotker, J.), rendered July 14, 1992, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, after a non-jury trial, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant’s legal sufficiency claim is unpreserved for appellate review because his motion for a trial order of dismissal was not specific (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Bynum, 70 NY2d 858). In any event, viewing the evidence adduced at trial in a light most favorable to the People (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. ContesNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. BaldiNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- People v. BynumNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. TurnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- People v. CipollaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. CannonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- People v. SingletonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- People v. RogersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- People v. RoysterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- People v. BeamonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.