Legal Opinion

Brooks v. Brooks

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided December 15, 1932PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

Final order unanimously reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs to appellant. It is conceded that defendant’s original entry upon the premises was lawful, and, therefore, she was not an intruder or a squatter within the provisions of subdivision 4 of section 1411 of the Civil Practice Act. (6 Wait N. Y. Prac. [3d ed.] 300, and cases cited; Matter of Stockwell v. Washburn, 59 Misc. 543; Frazier v. Cropsey, 124 id. 367; Williams v. Alt, 186 App. Div. 235; affd., 226 N. Y. 283.)

All concur; present, MacCrate, Lewis and Johnston, JJ.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Williams v. . AltNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  2. Stockwell v. Washburn, New York County Courts1908
  3. Williams v. AltAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Rosenstiel v. RosenstielAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1963
  2. Halaby v. HalabyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
  3. Mayeri v. MayeriNew York Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Mele v. Russo, New York County Courts1938
  5. Wright v. WrightCity of New York Municipal Court · 1946

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API