Legal Opinion

W. Witmark Sons v. . Hall-Berwin Corporation

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 19, 1918PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered November 23, 1917, which affirmed an order ¿f Special Term granting a motion by defendant for judgment .in its favor upon the pleadings. This action was brought to recover damages for the conversion of certain music plates, dies and cuts.

Read the full summary

Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered November 23, 1917, which affirmed an order ¿f Special Term granting a motion by defendant for judgment .in its favor upon the pleadings. This action was brought to recover damages for the conversion of certain music plates, dies and cuts. The complaint alleged that the defendant was a corporation engaged in the management of buildings, and it undertook, among other things, to perform the services and functions usually-performed by janitors; that the plaintiff was…

1Opinion of the Court

Order affirmed, with costs, and question certified answered in the negative; no opinion.

Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Chase, Collin, Cuddeback, Cardozo, Pound and Andrews, JJ.

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Eagle MacHine Co. v. American District Telegraph Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1957
  2. Thahill Realty Co. v. MartinCivil Court of the City of New York · 1976
  3. Zerder v. Friman Holding Co.New York Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Belmar, Inc. v. Dixie Building Maintenance, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API