Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Richard Mark Bowman

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 12, 2016No. 01-13-01045-CRPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON REMAND

Terry Jennings, Justice

Appellant, Richard Mark Bowman, challenges the trial court’s order denying his application for a writ of habeas corpus. 1 In two issues, appellant contends that the trial 'court ’erred in concluding that the State’s defense of laches bars his claim for habeas corpus relief, which he asserts on the ground of ineffective assistance of trial counsel, and in further denying him such relief -on the merits from a judgment of conviction of the misdemeanor offense of driving while intoxicated (“DWI”). 2

In appellant’s initial appeal, the State, for the first…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Wiggins v. Smith, WardenSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  3. Thompson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
  4. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Herrera v. CollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ex parte BowmanCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2017
  2. Ex parte GarciaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
  3. Daniel Albert Talamantes v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Daniel Albert Talamantes v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Ex parte BowmanCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API