Legal Opinion

Lanham v. Howell

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided April 3, 1953No. 14014_1Published

1Opinion of the Court

RIVES, Circuit Judge.

Appellant properly points out that we were in error in stating that the district court passed over the question of jurisdiction. The judge stated orally, “It is doubtful, but I will hold that the court does have jurisdiction”.

Appellant earnestly insists that for us to hold the final judgment in the state court conclusive in this court is in conflict with Gaines v. Fuentes, 92 U.S. 10, 23 L.Ed. 524, followed in Everhart v. Everhart, C.C., 34 F. 82. In each of those cases, it was held that a suit to annul a will as a muniment of title and to restrain the enforcement of a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Angel v. BullingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Case of Broderick's WillSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  3. Gaines v. FuentesSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  4. Everhart v. EverhartUnited States Circuit Court · 1888
  5. Le Blanc v. Southern Production Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API