Legal Opinion
United States v. Nicholas Marino
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided February 23, 1989No. 18-1041PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
SCIRICA, Circuit Judge.
This case is before us on remand from the United States Supreme Court for fur*550ther consideration in light of Mathews v. United States, 485 U.S. 58, 108 S.Ct. 883, 99 L.Ed.2d 54 (1988). We will affirm Mari-no’s conviction because (1) given the evidence of entrapment Marino presented at trial, he is not entitled to an instruction on entrapment under the standard enunciated in Mathews, and (2) Marino has asserted unequivocally that he has no additional evidence of entrapment to present that would justify remand for a proffer hearing, United States v.…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Mathews v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States of America, in No. 81-1020 v. Jannotti, Harry P. United States of America, in No. 81-1021 v. Schwartz, George XCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Arthur OrtizCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Jannotti, Harry P. Schwartz, George X. Appeal of Harry P. Jannotti, in No. 83-1093. Appeal of George X. Schwartz, in No. 83-1094Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Felix RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- United States v. PrangeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2014
- United States v. Hemant LakhaniCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- United States v. Lawrence WrightCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- United States v. GiampaDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1995
- United States v. Joe Fedroff. Appeal of Joseph FedroffCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.