Legal Opinion
St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co. v. Motor Vessel D. Mark
District Court, S.D. Alabama
Decided July 28, 1965No. Nos. 3060, 3073, 3108PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DANIEL HOLCOMBE THOMAS, District Judge.
These consolidated cases arise out of the striking of a rai’road bridge by a barge on the Alabama River. Admiralty No. 3060 is a suit by the owner of the bridge, St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Company, against the motor vessel, D Mark, for damages to the bridge. Admiralty No. 3073 is a suit by the owner of the striking barge, Radeliff Materials, Inc., against the vessel, D Mark, its owner, T & H Towing Company, and the St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Company, for damages to the barge. Admir*691alty No. 3108 is a suit by the owner of the vessel, T & H Towing…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Clement v. Metropolitan West Side El. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1903
- The Pennsylvania Railroad Company (Libellant and Cross-Respondent) v. S. S. Marie Leonhardt, Her Engines, Tackle, Apparel and Furniture, and Against All Persons Intervening and Their Interests in the Same (Respondents). Leonhardt & Blumberg of Hamburg, Germany, as Owner of S. S. Marie Leonhardt(cross-Libellant) v. The Pennsylvania Railroad Company (Cross-Respondent)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1963
- Wilmington Ry. Bridge Co. v. Franco-Ottoman Shipping Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1919
- City of Chicago v. MullenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1902
- Central R. v. Pennsylvania R.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1893
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Southern Pacific Transportation Co. v. Tug Capt. VickDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1977
- Melbourne Bros. Construction Co. v. Gnots-Reserve, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1984
- Alabama v. National Marine Service, Inc.District Court, S.D. Alabama · 1977
- Spivey Marine & Harbor Service Co. v. StateCourt of Claims of Illinois · 1994