Legal Opinion

English v. Amidon

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided November 3, 1903Published

Cask, for personal injuries. Trial by jury. At the September term, 1902, of the superior court the defendants’ motion for a non-suit was granted by Peaslee J., and the plaintiff excepted.

1Opinion

The defendants' motion for a rehearing must be denied. It was their non-delegable duty to provide reasonably safe stairs for use in the night-time; that is, adequate instrumentalities or means for the reasonably safe exit of their men from the factory. If at the time of the accident light was essential to such use, — if the danger incident to the defective stairs could have been obviated by artificial lighting, — the duty to furnish the necessary light, or in some way to guard against the apparent danger, was no more a delegable duty than the duty to maintain stairs of sufficient strength to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kaare v. Troy Steel & Iron Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1893
  2. New York, Chicago & St. Louis Railroad v. PerrigueyIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Collins v. St. Paul & Sioux City RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1882
  4. McLaine v. Head & Dowst Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1902
  5. Manning v. Manchester MillsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1900

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API