Legal Opinion

Becker Steel Co. v. Cummings

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided September 28, 1934PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MACK, Circuit Judge.

The bill alleges in substance that plaintiff is an American citizen; that its property was seized by the former Alien Property Custodian as the property of an alien enemy and thus wrongfully seized; that it was sold for $20,000; that nearly $4,000 was paid out by the Alien Property Custodian as expenses directly connected with the sale of such property; that theretofore an action was begun and a decree rendered in this court for $20,000, the value of the property so seized, without any allowance for the expenses so incurred; that that decree was satisfied and full releases…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Henkels v. SutherlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Becker Steel Co. of America v. HicksCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
  3. Escher v. WoodsSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  4. Kuttroff v. SutherlandCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Becker Steel Co. of America v. CummingsSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Becker Steel Co. of America v. CummingsSupreme Court of the United States · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API