Legal Opinion

Flowers v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided November 14, 1916PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Pike Law Court. Heard before Hon. T. L. Borum. John Flowers was convicted of violating the prohibition law and he appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtPelham, P. J.

The defendant was convicted on a charge of selling spirituous, vinous, or malt liquors without a license and contrary to law. We think the evidence afforded sufficient inference of the defendant’s guilt of the crime charged against him to authorize the submission of that question to the jury.

(1-4) The affidavit, the foundation of the prosecution, was sworn to, and the warrant of arrest executed, February 21, 1915, and the authority as to acting as agent cited by appellant has no. application. The general, or state-wide, prohibition laws were in force at the time the charge was made, and at…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cross v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
  2. Birmingham Railway, Light & Power Co. v. DrennenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  3. Wolffe v. MinnisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
  4. Sullivan v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
  5. Hauser v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1912

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Tyler v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API