Ortega v. Salt Lake Wet Wash Laundry

I concur in the results and most of the reasoning. Much that has been said in the prevailing opinion seems unnecessary to the conclusion. The question is well posed at the beginning of the opinion. “Is the Workman’s Compensation Act the exclusive remedy” for injury suffered by a minor in the course of his employment when illegally employed?

This question it seems to me is to be resolved by a reading together of the first part of Sec. 42-1-57, U. C. A. 1943, without the proviso which has nothing to do with the facts of this case, and subsection 2 of Sec. 42-1-41 and Sec. 14-6-27, U. C. A. 1943.…