Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Asmussen v. Young

District Court, D. South Dakota

Decided January 27, 2021No. 1:19-cv-01024Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA NORTHERN DIVISION DAVID JOHN ASMUSSEN, 1:19-CV-01024-4BK Petitioner, , OPINION AND ORDER/DENYING □ V8. MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION WARDEN DARIN YOUNG, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE ORDER DENYING A OF SOUTH DAKOTA, CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY Respondents Petitioner filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 2254

challenging his state court kidnapping convictions and life sentences. Petitioner contended that the state court erred in allowing him to represent himself at trial because he was not competent to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Holland v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  3. Gonzalez v. CrosbySupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. Godinez v. MoranSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Banister v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2020

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API