Legal Opinion

Donaldson v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided May 10, 2002No. 01-2510PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Mark P. Donaldson, proceeding pro se, appeals a district court order dismissing his civil action. This case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to *185Rule 34(j)(l), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a).

On January 5, 2001, the district court granted Donaldson’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis and ordered Donaldson to file a complaint. Donaldson did so, asserting that he was appealing an administrative agency’s decision on his application for a rural business enterprise grant. See…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sammie G. Byrd v. Michael P.W. StoneCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Vandiver v. MartinDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2004
  2. Abrams v. Paul, WardenDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2025
  3. Barry Keith Riddick v. POAH Management Company, et al.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2025
  4. Boardman v. CoyDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2025
  5. Bonds v. Berne Union Local SchoolsDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2022

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API