Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Mitchell

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 3, 1951No. 38,296PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Smith, J.:

This was an action for specific performance of written contracts, or in the event specific performance could not be had, the recovery of money. Judgment was for the plaintiff decreeing specific performance. The defendant has appealed.

The petition was in what the plaintiff denominated three counts.

In count 1 the petition alleged that on the 20th day of February, 1945, plaintiff and defendant, husband and wife, entered into a written contract whereby the defendant agreed to pay plaintiff $100 a month on the 5th day of each month as long as she…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Calkins v. CalkinsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1942

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Salenius v. SaleniusSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995
  2. Ringstrom v. RingstromAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  3. Elmer v. ElmerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
  4. Lantis v. LantisOregon Supreme Court · 1964
  5. In re Marriage of LeonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API