Legal Opinion

Stokes v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided June 1, 1915PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Violating Prohibition Law. Appeal from Covington. Circuit Court. Heard before Hon. H. A. Pearce. Jim Stokes was convicted of violating’ the prohibition law, and he appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, J.(1) The book to which Martin and other witnesses for the state were allowed to refer for the purpose of refreshing their recollection was the permanent record kept by the express company in the usual course of its business, and on which was recorded the character of the goods embraced in the shipment, the name of the consignee, the weight of the parcel and the date of delivery, and the name of the person to whom delivery was made. This record was made in part from the waybills accompanying the shipment. The evidence showed that when a shipment was delivered to' the consignee the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Birmingham Railway Light & Power Co. v. SeabornSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  2. H. H. Hitt Lumber Co. v. McCormackAlabama Court of Appeals · 1915
  3. Davie v. RolandAlabama Court of Appeals · 1912
  4. Young v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1913

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1979
  2. Franklin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1982
  3. Mount v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1996
  4. Smith v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API