Brody v. Village of Port Chester
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SOTOMAYOR, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff-appellant William Brody appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Harold Baer, Jr., District Judge) granting summary judgment for defendant-appellee the Village of Port Chester (“the Village”) on plaintiffs constitutional challenge to New York’s Eminent Domain Procedure Law. See N.Y. Em. Dom. Proc. Law § 201, et seq. (Con-sol.2003) (hereinafter “EDPL”). Brody claims that the procedures used by the Village in condemning his commercial property for use in an urban redevelopment project denied him due…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Carey v. PiphusSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Marc Andrew Mario v. P & C Food Markets, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Amnesty America v. Town of West HartfordCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- United States v. RayCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- Brody v. Village of Port ChesterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- Gregory Webster v. Mount Vernon Fire Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- Gredd v. Bear, Stearns Securities Corp. (In Re Manhattan Investment Fund Ltd.)District Court, S.D. New York · 2006
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.