Legal Opinion

Martin Marietta Corp. v. Douglas County

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided June 28, 1973No. 28039PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hawes, Justice.

1. Appellees’ motion to dismiss this appeal is denied under Rule 11 (c) of the Rules of the Supreme Court.

2. In Gifford-Hill & Co. v. Harrison, 229 Ga. 260 (191 SE2d 85) (1972), and as well in Jackson v. Abercrombie, 229 Ga. 775 (194 SE2d 473) (1972), we held that a county governing authority which had taken action to establish conditional uses of land pursuant to local enabling legislation or the General Planning Enabling Act of 1957, Code Ann. § 69-120, et seq., might not thereafter deny a permit to a conditional use applicant for any reason if the property for which the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gifford-Hill & Co. v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1972
  2. Jackson v. AbercrombieSupreme Court of Georgia · 1972

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. City of Atlanta v. Wansley Moving & Storage Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1980
  2. Martin Marietta Corp. v. MacOn-bibb County Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
  3. Westbrook v. Albany Planning CommissionCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API