Legal Opinion

Harris v. Clark

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided January 29, 1908PublishedCited by 4 opinions

EXCEPTIONS EROM Circuit Court, Fibst Circuit.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OP THE COURT BY

WILDER, J.

This is an action of assumpsit, tbe defense being the statute of limitations. Defendant executed a promissory note in favor of plaintiff at Pasadena, California, on June 7, 1897, payable in one year. The action was begun, in the circuit court on August 16, 1906, which court, after a trial jury waived, gave judgment for plaintiff, and defendant comes to this court on exceptions which raise the sole question of whether the evidence shows a new promise so as to take the case out of the statute of limitations.

The evidence relied on to show a new promise consists…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bell v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
  2. Clementson v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1814
  3. Shepherd v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  4. Moore v. President of the Bank of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
  5. Horner v. StarkeyIllinois Supreme Court · 1861

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. First American Savings & Trust Co. v. LowHawaii Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Maciel v. KaluaHawaii Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Otokichi v. SekijiroHawaii Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Macaulay v. SchurmannHawaii Supreme Court · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API