Kline v. Berg Drywall, Inc.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Dissent · HansonHanson, Justice
I respectfully dissent. I would discharge the writ of certiorari on the grounds that Kline has waived his right to review by this court because he is bound by the rules of the Fund, which expressly limit the parties to a single appellate review and which select the WCCA to provide that review. Kline is bound by the waiver contained in those rules because the rules were agreed to by his union in a collective bargaining agreement, as authorized by MinmStat. § 176.1812 .(2002).1 The majority’s refusal to enforce the rules of the Fund will place Minnesota at odds with all of the other states that…
Also in this document: Dissent · Blatz.
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Flagg Bros., Inc. v. BrooksSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Edmonson v. Leesville Concrete Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Smith v. AllwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.