Legal Opinion
Karas-Abraham v. Abraham
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 7, 2010PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*429The award of four years’ maintenance and the amount of child support were properly premised on the imputation of income to defendant based on the report of the neutral forensic accountants and the referee’s credibility findings (see Gering v Tavano, 50 AD3d 299, 300 [2008], lv denied 11 NY3d 707 [2008]). It is clear that defendant was the monied spouse who had been hiding income through his family’s companies, his own business in which he was the sole shareholder, and illusory undocumented loans that he used to support a standard of living that would have been impossible to maintain on the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Johnson v. ChapinNew York Court of Appeals · 2009
- Naimollah v. De UgarteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Fabrikant v. FabrikantAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Winter v. WinterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Acosta v. AcostaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Seale v. SealeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Linda D. v. Theo C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Linda D. v. Theo C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Seale v. SealeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017