Legal Opinion

Rundlett v. Director

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 10, 1935PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKelly, J.

At the time involved herein, defendants conducted and operated a general department store and the business connected therewith at 186 North Commercial street in the city of Salem.

On the 15th day of September, 1930, plaintiff entered and walked about said store for the purpose of transacting business with defendants, whereupon plaintiff fell to the floor and suffered the injuries herein. Plaintiff claimed that the floor was oily and that a nail protruded therefrom upon which the heel of plaintiff’s shoe caught thus causing her to fall.

Three questions are presented: First, it is urged that…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  2. Attaway v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1900
  3. Young v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1928
  4. Chapman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1900
  5. Pate v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1918

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Saunders v. A. M. Williams & Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Garber v. MartinOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Garber v. MartinOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Johnson v. HansenOregon Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Johnson v. HansenOregon Supreme Court · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API