Faulk v. McCartney
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Finney District Court. The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Holt, C.:
This action was brought by Charles E. Eaulk, plaintiff in error, for the purpose of compelling *696the defendant, as director of School District No. 6, Finney county, to sign an order on the district treasurer for the payment of $40 for wages as teacher for one school month. The Hon. A. J. Abbott, judge of the twenty-seventh judicial district, granted an alternative writ of mandamus. On January 1, 1888, in the Finney district court, a motion to quash the alternative writ was sustained. The plaintiff brings the case here for review.
It is claimed that the alternative writ of…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Corum v. Common School District No. Twenty-OneIdaho Supreme Court · 1935
- Joint Consolidated School District No. 2 ex rel. Engelhardt v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1947
- Cope v. School District No. 122Washington Supreme Court · 1928
- Barton v. School District No. 2Oregon Supreme Court · 1915