Legal Opinion

Faulk v. McCartney

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 15, 1889PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error from Finney District Court. The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Holt, C.:

This action was brought by Charles E. Eaulk, plaintiff in error, for the purpose of compelling *696the defendant, as director of School District No. 6, Finney county, to sign an order on the district treasurer for the payment of $40 for wages as teacher for one school month. The Hon. A. J. Abbott, judge of the twenty-seventh judicial district, granted an alternative writ of mandamus. On January 1, 1888, in the Finney district court, a motion to quash the alternative writ was sustained. The plaintiff brings the case here for review.

It is claimed that the alternative writ of…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Corum v. Common School District No. Twenty-OneIdaho Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Joint Consolidated School District No. 2 ex rel. Engelhardt v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1947
  3. Cope v. School District No. 122Washington Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Barton v. School District No. 2Oregon Supreme Court · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API