Legal Opinion
Procacci v. Seitlin
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided November 18, 1986No. 86-2156PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
497 So.2d 969 (1986)
Pasquale PROCACCI, Petitioner,
v.
Sam SEITLIN, Respondent.
No. 86-2156.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
November 18, 1986.
Ruden, Barnett, McClosky, Schuster & Russell and Gill S. Freeman, Miami, for petitioner.
Greenberg, Traurig, Askew, Hoffman, Lipoff, Rosen & Quentel and Alan T. Dimond and Raquel A. Rodriguez, Miami, for respondent.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and HENDRY and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.
SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge.
While the client, the petitioner Procacci, waived his attorney-client privilege as to a particular real estate transaction by suing his attorney…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Perrignon v. Bergen Brunswig Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 1978
- Eastern Air Lines, Inc. v. GellertDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
- United States v. MontiDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1951
- Hoyas v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
- Goldman, Sachs & Co. v. BlondisDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Chomat v. Northern Ins. Co. of New YorkDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
- Coyne v. SCHWARTZ, GOLD, COHEN, ZAKARINDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
- Boudreau v. CarlisleDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
- Courville v. PROMEDCO OF SW FLA.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
- Paradise Divers, Inc. v. UpmalDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.