Legal Opinion

Royal Indemnity Co. v. Cliff Wood, Coal & Supply Co.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided February 12, 1926No. 4468PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOORMAN, Circuit Judge.

There is a statute of Ohio requiring one about to enter into a contract to construct a public building or other improvement to execute bond, with surety, to pay for all labor performed or material furnished in the construction or improvements to be made. The plaintiff in error was surety on a bond executed to the city of Lima for the construction of an in*502tereepting outfall sewer. The contractor defaulted in the performance of his contract, and this action was brought against the surety to recover.for material furnished on the work.

The bond bound the principal and surety…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. Ætna Casualty & Surety Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1925
  2. Walsh Const. Co. v. City of ClevelandDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1918

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fountain Sand & Gravel v. Chilton Const. Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. American Surety Co. of New York v. Public Schools of Benton HarborCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API