Legal Opinion

Beavers v. State

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided March 10, 2000No. S-8399PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MATTHEWS, Chief Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

The superior court dismissed Timothy Beavers’s robbery indictment on the ground that his confession was involuntary. The court of appeals reinstated the indictment, finding the confession voluntary under the “totality of the circumstances.” Beavers argues that his confession was presumptively involuntary because it was partially induced by a police officer’s threat of harsher treatment. Because we agree with Beavers, we reverse the court of appeals decision and vacate Beavers’s indictment.

II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

A. Facts

The facts of this case are…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Bram v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  4. United States v. Danny Leon GuerreroCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  5. United States v. Katrina Ann TingleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. State v. LawrenceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  2. State v. RogersNebraska Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State v. SwaniganSupreme Court of Kansas · 2005
  4. Vent v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2003
  5. Munson v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2005

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API