Coleman v. City of Pikeville
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
BUCKINGHAM, Judge.
Appellants, Beverly Coleman, Sonya May, and Racine Damron, appeal from a judgment of the Pike Circuit Court in favor of Appellee,. City of Pikeville (the City). We affirm.
In 1984, the Pikeville Urban Renewal and Community Development Agency (PURCDA) sent a letter to Ola Goff, the appellants’ predecessor in interest to the subject real property, offering to purchase the 1.348-acre tract.1 The letter apparently stated that if Goff did not agree to the *525price offered, the property would then be condemned pursuant to the Eminent Domain Act of Kentucky found in Kentucky Revised…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. GolightlyKentucky Supreme Court · 1998
- Duddy's v. State Department of TransportationNevada Supreme Court · 1997
3Cited by3 opinions
- Knop v. Gardner Edgerton Unified School District No. 231Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2009
- Knop v. GARDNER EDGERTON UNIFIED SCH. DIST.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2009
- Yahnig v. City of SomersetCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2003