Legal Opinion

Coleman v. City of Pikeville

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided June 11, 1999No. 1997-CA-003145-MRPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BUCKINGHAM, Judge.

Appellants, Beverly Coleman, Sonya May, and Racine Damron, appeal from a judgment of the Pike Circuit Court in favor of Appellee,. City of Pikeville (the City). We affirm.

In 1984, the Pikeville Urban Renewal and Community Development Agency (PURCDA) sent a letter to Ola Goff, the appellants’ predecessor in interest to the subject real property, offering to purchase the 1.348-acre tract.1 The letter apparently stated that if Goff did not agree to the *525price offered, the property would then be condemned pursuant to the Eminent Domain Act of Kentucky found in Kentucky Revised…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. GolightlyKentucky Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Duddy's v. State Department of TransportationNevada Supreme Court · 1997

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Knop v. Gardner Edgerton Unified School District No. 231Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2009
  2. Knop v. GARDNER EDGERTON UNIFIED SCH. DIST.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2009
  3. Yahnig v. City of SomersetCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API