Legal Opinion

Lessee of Hartley v. M'Anulty

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 15, 1804PublishedCited by 8 opinions

A POINT was reserved on the trial of this cause, at the last Circuit Court, which the justices continued under advisement. They now proceeded to deliver their opinions.

1Opinion of the CourtYeates, J.

This cause was tried on the 6th October 1803, and the plaintiff obtained a verdict for 95 J acres in Fannet township. He claimed under a sale by the sheriff, who seized and sold the same as the property of Alexander Moore. At the trial a point was made, and reserved for further consideration, whether the deed from Robert Karr, the patentee, to Alexander Moore, dated 5th April 1787, passed any estate to the grantee. No consideration was expressed in the body of the deed; but a receipt was subjoined thereto, whereby the grantor acknowledged that *95“he liad received from the grantee 250 in specie,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Buehler v. GloningerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1834
  2. Evans v. DravoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1854
  3. Cox's Administrators v. HenrySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1858

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Parrott v. BakerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1889
  2. Buehler v. GloningerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1834
  3. Evans v. DravoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1854
  4. Bank of United States v. BurkeIndiana Supreme Court · 1835
  5. Frink v. GreenNew York Supreme Court · 1849

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API