Legal Opinion

Gulec v. Chrysler Corp.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 14, 1940No. Docket No. 50, Calendar No. 40,654PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON REHEARING.

ON REHEARING.

Further consideration of this case upon rehearing brings the conviction that our former opinion, ante, 159, was erroneous. The details of pertinent facts are accurately stated in that opinion. Our error was in concluding that the present record does not show "a change in condition affecting earning capacity." Instead, both in fact and in law such a change of condition was shown and the department of labor and industry on review specifically found:

"In our opinion the plaintiff is totally disabled as a result of the accidental injury, at least it would be unusual if…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hayward v. Kalamazoo Stove Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Casey v. Escanaba & Lake Superior RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Schinderle v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Zelinckas v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1940

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Webber v. Steiger Lumber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Ledward v. Public Welfare Board of FlintMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Ellis v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Sweet v. Eddy Paper Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1942
  5. White v. Michigan Consolidated Gas Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1958

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API