Legal Opinion

Docter v. Gleicher (In Re Stillman)

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland

Decided January 13, 1983No. 19-10681PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF OPINION

PAUL MANNES, Bankruptcy Judge.

On January 4, 1983, defendants, Dennis A. Gleicher, M.D., Lewis B. Newberg, M.D., and The Howard County Doctors’ Building Limited Partnership, filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. For the reasons set forth herein, the court has signed an order denying the motion. Defendants urge that the United States District Court for the District of Maryland likewise lacks subject matter jurisdiction. This court need not resolve that question and, therefore, does not address it in this opinion.

Statement…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Mesa Farm Co v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re ConleyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1983
  2. Matter of Seven Springs Apartments, Phase IIUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 1983
  3. Color Craft Press, Ltd. v. Nationwide Shopper Systems, Inc. (In Re Color Craft Press, Ltd.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah · 1983
  4. Walter E. Heller & Co., Southeast, Inc. v. Matlock Trailer Corp. (In Re Matlock Trailer Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1983
  5. Ward v. Guglielmo (In Re Guglielmo)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Louisiana · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API