Legal Opinion
Toomer v. Witsell
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided October 11, 1948No. 415PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court 1
334 U.S. 385 (1948)
TOOMER ET AL.
v.
WITSELL ET AL.
No. 415.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued January 13-14, 1948.
Decided June 7, 1948.
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA.
Aaron Kravitch and Robert E. Falligant argued the cause for appellants. With them on the brief were Phyllis Kravitch and John J. Bouhan.
J. Monroe Fulmer, Assistant Attorney General of South Carolina, and David W. Robinson argued the cause for appellees. With them on the brief were John M. Daniel, Attorney General, T.C. Callison, Assistant Attorney General, and James…
Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Vinson; Concurrence.
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Truax v. RaichSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Paul v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Rescue Army v. Municipal Court of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Toomer v. WitsellSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Coe v. ErrolSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Kevin Marilley v. Charlton BonhamCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Kevin Marilley v. Charlton BonhamCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Kevin Marilley v. Charlton BonhamCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016