Legal Opinion
Minneapolis-Moline Power Implement Co. v. Wright
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided November 7, 1938PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBland, J.
— This is an action in replevin to recover the possession of a combine sold by plaintiff to the defendant under a written contract dated May 6, 1935.
The defendant filed an answer and a counterclaim. In the counterclaim defendant sought to recover damages for the alleged breach of the contract. The sufficiency of the pleading's is not questioned by either party. The contract recites the purchase price was $155 cash, plus freight, and three notes executed by defendant in the total amount of $1064.
Trial to a jury resulted in a verdict for the plaintiff for the recovery of the possession of the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Fox v. WindesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1895
- Nichols-Shepard Co. v. RhoadmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1905
- McCormick Harvesting Machine Co. v. HillMissouri Court of Appeals · 1904
- Bank of Polk v. WoodMissouri Court of Appeals · 1915
- Price v. HallettSupreme Court of Missouri · 1897
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Reliance Cooperage Corp. v. TreatCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1952
- Ketel v. HovickWashington Supreme Court · 1955
- Transport Manufacturing & Equipment Co. v. Fruehauf Trailer Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1961
- Thirty-Three Venturers, Inc. v. DickeyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
- Transport Manufacturing & Equipment Company, a Corporation, and Riss & Company, Inc., a Corporation v. Fruehauf Trailer Company, a Corporation, Fruehauf Trailer Company, a Corporation v. Transport Manufacturing & Equipment Company, a Corporation and Riss & Company, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1961