Legal Opinion

Morris v. Taylor

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 26, 1897PublishedCited by 9 opinions

From Clatsop: Thomas A. McBride, Judge. Application by Morris & Whitehead, a corporation, for a writ of mandamus compelling Frank J. Taylor, mayor of the City of Astoria, and others, to execute and deliver to the applicant certain municipal bonds. From a judgment denying the application, said applicant appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Bean.

In April, 1897, the City of Astoria, haying a bonded indebtedness of $100,050, and a floating indebtedness, represented by warrants owned by the plaintiff, of-$90,000, passed an ordinance providing for the exchange of negotiable twenty-year bonds of the city, bearing semiannual interest at the rate of 6 per cent, per annum, for said warrants. By this ordinance it was provided that the bonds should be deposited with the city treasurer, and by him kept in a safe place until such time as the plaintiff, or its duly authorized agent, should deliver to him any of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Town of Solon v. Williamsburgh Savings BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. City of Galena v. CorwithIllinois Supreme Court · 1868
  3. Rogan v. City of WatertownWisconsin Supreme Court · 1872
  4. Portland Savings Bank v. City of EvansvilleU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Indiana · 1885

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. City of Huron v. Second Ward Sav. BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1898
  2. In Re Menefee, State TreasurerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  3. West v. Town of Lake PlacidSupreme Court of Florida · 1929
  4. In re State to Issue Bonds to Fund IndebtednessSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  5. National Life Insurance v. MeadSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1900

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API