Legal Opinion

Henry v. Leasco Fleeting & Barge Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided February 23, 1999No. 98 CA 0157Published

1Opinion of the Court

J2FITZSIMMONS, J.

Plaintiffs-in-intervention, Greenwood Contractors, Inc.1 and its insurer, U.S. Fire Insurance Company (hereinafter “Greenwood”), appeal from the grant of an exception of no cause and/or right of action in favor of defendants, Leasco Fleeting and Barge Services, Inc.2 and Certain Underwriters at Lloyds and Certain British Companies (hereinafter “Leasco”). We reverse the lower court ruling.

Petitioner, Leroy Henry, was an employee of Greenwood. On December 6, 1988, Henry was injured while in the process of unloading a barge owned by Leasco. Pursuant to the Longshoremen’s and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. v. PfeiferSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Bloomer v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Terrence Peters v. North River Insurance Company of Morristown, New Jersey and Bergeron Shipyards, Inc., Intervenors-Appellants v. Speeflo Manufacturing CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
  4. Robert M. Taylor, Insurance Co. Of North America, Intervenor-Appellee v. Bunge CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
  5. R.G. Speaks, Texas Employers' Insurance Association, Intervenor-Appellee v. Trikora Lloyd P.T., in PersonamCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API