Legal Opinion

Phillips v. Jones

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 14, 1906PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Appeal from Jefferson Chancery Court; John M. Elliott, Chancellor; Where the purchaser of lands under a parol agreement has been put in possession, under a part performance of contract, it need not be in writing. Receipt of purchase money in part performance takes the case out of the statute of frauds. 19 Ark. 23; lb. 48; Tiedeman on Eq.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Jefferson Chancery Court; John M. Elliott, Chancellor; Where the purchaser of lands under a parol agreement has been put in possession, under a part performance of contract, it need not be in writing. Receipt of purchase money in part performance takes the case out of the statute of frauds. 19 Ark. 23; lb. 48; Tiedeman on Eq. Jur. § 296, and authorities cited; lb. § 309. Letters, indorsements, receipts, verbal acknowledgments and admissions are sufficient to take the case out of the statute of frauds. 3 Graft. 339; 43 Pa. St. 170; 1 John. Ch. 131; 34 N. Y. 312; Washburn, Real…

1Opinion of the CourtMcCulloch, J.

This is a suit in equity brought by appellant against appellee to require specific performance of an alleged verbal contract to convey certain real estate, a lot in the city of Pine Bluff. Appellant owned and occupied the real estate in question, and mortgaged it to certain persons as security for a debt of $250, who foreclosed the mortgage in chancery, and appellee purchased the lot for $190 at a sale made by the commissioner of the court. His purchase was confirmed, and a deed was executed by the commissioner and approved by the coxxrt. The sale to appellee was confirmed, and deed made on…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Moore v. GordonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1884
  2. Pindall v. TrevorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1875
  3. Coleman v. HillSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1884
  4. Pledger v. GarrisonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1883

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Shaughnessy v. EidsmoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
  2. United States v. United Shoe Machinery Co.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1916
  3. Hogan v. ThrasherMontana Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Ashcraft v. TuckerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918
  5. Gilfillan v. SchallerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API