Legal Opinion

Minnehoma Automobile Ass'n v. Bill Seidle's Nissan, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 1, 1990No. 89-1993Published

1Per curiam

We affirm the summary judgment without prejudice to Minnehoma Automobile Association, Inc., to amend its pleadings to name the real party in interest and to establish that party’s actual damages. See Allen v. Port Everglades Authority, 553 So.2d 1341 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989); Gulotty v. Estate of Wilkie, 532 So.2d 1335 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); Forte v. Tripp & Skrip, 339 So.2d 698 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976).

Our decision does not conflict with the holding of the Florida Supreme Court in Dober v. Worrell, 401 So.2d 1322 (Fla.1981) (appellate court not permitted to rule on merits of trial court judgment and then…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. ARKY, FREED v. Bowmar Instrument Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1988
  2. Rubenstein v. Burleigh House, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
  3. Wackenhut Protective Sys. v. KEY BISCAYNE, ETC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
  4. Forte v. Tripp & SkripDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
  5. Allen v. Port Everglades AuthorityDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API