Legal Opinion

DPR, INC. v. City of Pittsburg

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided January 23, 1998No. 76,352PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lewis, J.:

Appellant DPR, Inc., whom we shall refer to as plaintiff, has been operating in the City of Pittsburg (City) for over 15 years. The owners of DPR, Inc., Patricia and Don Rohrbaugh, operate a business known as “Pat’s Lounge.” This business is licensed to sell alcoholic beverages by the drink. It also features totally nude dancing as entertainment. It is worth noting that Pat’s Lounge had been in the business of serving intoxicating liquors and presenting nude dancing to the public for approximately 15 years prior to the enactment of the ordinance which is the focal point of this…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Eisenstadt v. BairdSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Pap's A.M. v. City of ErieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. State ex rel. State Board of Healing Arts v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2004
  3. Nichols v. Kansas Governmental Ethics CommissionCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2001
  4. Aten v. Kansas Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2001
  5. Edge v. City of EverettDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2017

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API