Bussard v. Binder
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDenecke, C. J.
In this action plaintiffs recovered damages because of the defendant’s alleged breach of an implied promise in a sharecrop lease to harvest wheat in a husbandlike manner. The trial court sitting without a jury awarded plaintiffs judgment of $4,223.40 and defendant appeals.
The parties entered into a verbal lease of plaintiffs’ land whereby defendant was to pay as rent one-third of the wheat crop to be raised by defendant. Defendant contends that under this arrangement he did not have an implied duty to exercise good husbandry in cultivating and harvesting the crop.
We have not decided…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Fremont Lumber Co. v. Starrell Petroleum Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1961
- Shultz v. RameyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1958
- Cammack v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1903
- Patton v. GarrettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1881
- Yeadon v. GrahamOregon Supreme Court · 1975
3Cited by3 opinions
- UNITED STATES NAT. BANK OF OR. v. CaldwellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
- Bennett v. HebenerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
- Baker v. PraegitzerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979