United States v. Harold Bear Runner
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
LAY, Circuit Judge.
Harold Bear Runner appeals a conviction based on a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1153 and S. D. Compiled Laws Ann. § 22-22-19 (1967) for incest. The government’s evidence rested primarily on the testimony of the victim, defendant’s 12 year old daughter.
Defendant asserts as error on appeal that reasonable doubt of his guilt exists as a matter of law since there was no corroboration of the victim’s testimony; and that the trial court erred in admitting evidence of prior incestuous acts. We affirm.
In urging the need for corroboration, defendant relies on the decision in United…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bracey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1944
- Edward Earle Beck v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
- United States v. Henry Thomas ShippCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1969
- United States v. PanettaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1977
- United States v. Walter E. AsheCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. Tony RabbitCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997