Legal Opinion

United States v. Williams

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided June 3, 1922No. 6810PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Criminal prosecution by the United States against Charles Williams. On question of clerk’s right to fee on return of Liberty Bonds deposited as bail.

1Opinion of the Court

NETERER, District Judge.

The defendant deposited Liberty Bonds with the clerk of this court in lieu of personal bond. The condition of the deposit has been satisfied, and the defendant has demanded a. return of the bonds. The clerk, pursuant to section 828, R. S. (section 1383, C. S.), 'demanded as a condition to the return the payment of 1 per centum of the face value of the bonds. The court’s attention is called to McGovern et al. v. United States (C. C. A.) 272 Fed. 262, in which it is held that, under section 1320 of the Revenue Act of 1919 (Comp. St. Ann. Supp. 1919, § 3301a), United…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Knox v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  2. Juilliard v. GreenmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. Levy's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
  4. Berkman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  5. Lewis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1889

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Flower v. DortCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953
  2. Phelps v. Citizens Union Nat. BankDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1936
  3. United States v. PayneDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1929
  4. Amoskeag Mfg. Co. v. GagneDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1936
  5. Flower v. DortCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API