Legal Opinion
People v. Hildabrandt
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 22, 1966No. Crim. No. 2372PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKerrigan, J.
By an information filed on January 8, 1965, the appellant and a codefendant, Lee McMiekle, alias Craig Cannon, were charged in two counts of violations of Penal Code, section 211 (robbery), and Penal Code, section 484a, subdivision (b)(6) (unlawful use of a credit card). Both defendants were found guilty of each crime. Application for probation was denied, and defendants were sentenced to state prison. Only the defendant Hildabrandt appeals from the judgment of conviction.
In essence, the appellant contends that certain extrajudicial statements amounting to a confession which were extracted…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Townsend v. SainSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- People v. LaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- People v. DohertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- State v. YoungSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
- People v. BrockmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- People v. PinedaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.