Legal Opinion

Cumming v. Archinard

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided September 15, 1846PublishedCited by 7 opinions

APPEAL from the District Court of Rapides, King, J.

1Opinion of the Court

The judgment of the court was pronounced by

Slidem,, J.

This is an appeal from a decree of seizure and sale. The first question to be considered is the alleged defectiveness of the clerk’s certificate, by reason of which the appellee contends that we cannot consider the merits. The certificate is in the words: “I hereby certify the foregoing to be a true and perfect transcript of the record, documents, and proceedings of the suit entitled Alonzo Cumming v. C. & F. Archinard, existing in this office. In testimony,” &c.

In proceedings by seizure and sale all the evidence must be in the form of…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Tapp v. Guaranty Finance CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1964
  2. Myrtle Grove Packing Company v. MonesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1954
  3. MacK Trucks, Inc. v. DixonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
  4. Bourgeois v. SazdoffLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1968
  5. Germania Savings Bank v. LemleySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1898

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API