Legal Opinion

In re Godart

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided April 21, 1937Published

1Opinion of the Court

LEIBELL, District Judge.

' Motion granted, and order will be vacated to the extent that it restrains the moving party or her attorney from proceeding with pending motion to punish bankrupt for contempt of state court. In re Koronsky (C.C.A.) 170 F. 719; In re Hall (D.C.) 170. F. 721; In re Sims (D.C.) 176 F. 645; In re Francisco (D.C.) 245 F. 216; In re Metz (D.C.) 6 F.(2d) 962. It may be that the proceedings to punish for contempt in the "city court, instituted on March 11, 1937 (three days after the adjudication in this court and the issuance of its restraining order), were taken with actual…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re KoronskyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1909
  2. In Re MetzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925
  3. In re SimsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1910
  4. In re FranciscoDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API