Legal Opinion

330 Bleecker Street Corp. v. Mutual Tile Corp.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 22, 1932PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

As between the appellant, Mutual Tile Company, and the New York Title and Mortgage Company rights and priorities must obviously be ascertained and settled. Since its rights and interests are or may be involved in that settlement respondent should have an opportunity to be heard in the matter. The proper forum for the determination of all these equities and priorities is in this action. (McDermott v. Lawyers Mortgage Co., 232 N. Y. 336, 349.)

The order should be reversed, with costs in all courts, and the motion granted, with ten dollars costs. Question No. 1 is not answered. Question No. 2 is…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. P. T. McDermott, Inc. v. Lawyers Mortgage Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1922

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. American Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Gateway AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  2. Sohmer v. Gedney Hills, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API