Legal Opinion

Galtney v. Underwood Neuhaus and Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided September 12, 1985No. B14-85-397-CVPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MURPHY, Justice.

Appellants bring this accelerated appeal to contest a temporary injunction entered by the trial court to preserve the status quo pending arbitration and trial of the cause of action. In two points of error, *603appellants dispute the trial court’s jurisdiction to enter the temporary injunction and challenge the limitations imposed upon their efforts to cross-examine a witness and present evidence at the hearing on the injunction. We reverse and render in part and affirm in part.

Appellee, Underwood Neuhaus, instituted legal proceedings in April of 1985 against all three…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Davis v. HueyTexas Supreme Court · 1978
  2. O'Shea v. Coronado Transmission Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1983
  3. District of Columbia Board of Parole v. BrandonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. City of Arlington v. Texas Electric Service Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1976
  5. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. McCollumCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lambda Construction Co. v. City of AliceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987
  2. Galtney v. Underwood Neuhaus and Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1985
  3. Sienna Ranch Investments, LLC and Broadway Construction, LLC v. Waller Independent School District, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API