Legal Opinion

Hall v. Collins

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 6, 1930No. 19987PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.

1. Where the consideration of a contract made with a husband reaches the wife as an accession to her separate estate, and she retains and enjoys it, as building materials used in the construction of a building upon her lands, slight evidence will be sufficient to establish the husband’s agency in contracting the debt as an obligation against the wife. Pinkston v. Cedar Hill Nursery &c. Co., 123 Ga. 302 (51 S. E. 387); Sheffield v. Sheffield, 39 Ga. App. 271 (146 S. E. 655), and cit.

2. In this suit on account against a married woman, to recover the alleged purchase-price of building materials,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pinkston v. Cedar Hill Nursery & Orchard Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  2. Cornelia Planing Mill Co. v. WilcoxSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  3. Sheffield v. SheffieldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929
  4. Sheffield v. SheffieldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Barrington v. Davis Jenkins & SonsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
  2. Macarthy v. Ross Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API