Legal Opinion · Dissent

Sherwood Complex LLC v. Vouzan

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided May 26, 2004Published

1Dissent

Pesce, EJ.

(dissenting). I respectfully dissent. I agree with the majority that the tenant satellite dish installation at issue in the present summary proceeding is not within the ambit of Telecommunications Act of 1996 § 207 (Pub L 104-104, 110 US Stat 56) and its implementing regulations. However, I do not agree that the lease provision cited as the grounds for the petition herein may be read to bar the satellite dish installation at issue. While a satellite dish arguably falls under the heading of “other projections” which may not be “attached to the outside walls of the building” in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Urban Horizons Tax Credit Fund, L.P. v. ZarickCivil Court of the City of New York · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API