Legal Opinion

Thames & Mersey Marine Ins. v. O'Connell

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 14, 1898No. 375PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from ■ the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of California.

1Opinion of the Court

BOSS, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from a decree giren the libelant in the court below. The appellant, who was the respondent liiere, underwrote a policy of marine'insurance on the interest of Thomas O'Farrell, the libelant’s intestate, in the schooner Bob-ert and Minnie, against perils of the seas and other perils in the policy mentioned. The policy contained, among other warranties, the following:

“(4) Not to use any ports or places on the west coast of America north of San Francisco, nor islands adjacent thereto, except Umpqua and Columbia Rivers, Humboldt, Coos, and Shoalwater Bays,…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. v. Knickerbocker Steam Towage Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API