Legal Opinion

Conway v. Housing Authority of City of Atlanta

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 8, 1960No. 38377PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Frankum, Judge.

1. The sole question to be determined is whether or not the plaintiff's petition is subject to a general demurrer. Much of the strenuous and learned argument by counsel for the housing authority should be properly addressed to the demurrers raising the questions of duplicity, misjoinder, and multifariousness. These demurrers were not passed on by the trial court. Consequently, if the petition sets forth a right of recovery in any amount against the defendant, the housing authority, the general demurrer should have been overruled.

The plaintiff at least alleges a cause of action…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Atlantic Coast Line R. v. BlalockCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1910
  2. Bailey v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
  3. Highsmith v. National Linen Service Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1940
  4. Mitcham v. SingletonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  5. Neal & Son v. StanleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Jackson v. Brinegar, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  2. Burke v. Life Insurance Co. of GeorgiaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
  3. Puritan Mills, Inc. v. Pickering Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
  4. G & B CONTRACTORS, INC. v. Coronet Developers, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
  5. Gilbert v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API